Urban Fantasy

How to Write Urban Fantasy Beyond the Dresden Formula

Kia Orion | | 5 min read

In 2000, Jim Butcher was a struggling writer attending a writing workshop where his instructor told him to pick a familiar genre and follow the conventions. He didn't love the idea. He thought he knew better. But he did it anyway, combining Buffy-style monster-of-the-week plotting with a hard-boiled detective narrator, and Storm Front became the first book in what's now a twenty-novel series that essentially defined modern urban fantasy.

The problem, twenty-six years later, is that everybody followed the same advice Butcher's instructor gave him. Open with a wisecracking protagonist. Layer in some vampires and werewolves. Set it in a real American city. Sprinkle in a will-they-won't-they romantic subplot. The formula became so dominant that readers started calling the whole genre "Dresden clones," and by 2015, editors were rejecting manuscripts because the template had been worn through.

But here's the thing about formulas. They work until they don't, and then the writers who figure out what the formula was actually doing, underneath all the surface elements, are the ones who find a way forward.

The question isn't whether to follow Butcher's template. It's figuring out which parts of the template were structural, meaning they're load-bearing walls, and which were just decoration specific to his particular moment in publishing. Understanding the difference is the whole game when you're trying to figure out how to write urban fantasy today.

How to Write Urban Fantasy: The Load-Bearing Walls

Ilona Andrews figured this out early. Their Kate Daniels series, starting with Magic Bites in 2007, looks like a Dresden clone on the surface. First-person narrator. Magic in a modern city. Snarky voice. But the structural innovation was subtle and significant: they made the magic public. In Kate Daniels' Atlanta, magic waves knock out technology in unpredictable cycles. Everyone knows about shapeshifters and vampires. There's no masquerade to maintain.

This one change rewired everything. When magic isn't hidden, you don't need conspiracy plots. You don't need a protagonist who stands between the mundane and supernatural worlds as a lonely bridge. Instead, you can write about politics, economics, territorial disputes. Kate Daniels reads more like a post-apocalyptic political thriller than a detective novel, even though it hits every emotional beat readers come to urban fantasy for: the found family, the slow-burn romance, the escalating threats.

The load-bearing wall was never "magic must be secret." It was "the protagonist must navigate between groups with conflicting interests." Butcher did it through secrecy. Andrews did it through open factional warfare. Same structural purpose, completely different execution.

The Tone Problem in Urban Fantasy Writing

There's a voice that dominates the genre to the point where it's almost invisible: sardonic first-person, heavy on pop culture references, emotionally guarded until a specific moment of vulnerability near the climax. Butcher does it. Harrison does it. Kevin Hearne does it in the Iron Druid books. It's comfortable and familiar and, if I'm honest, I still enjoy reading it.

T. Kingfisher's approach to urban fantasy is instructive because she refuses that voice entirely. Her protagonists in books like A House With Good Bones aren't sardonic. They're anxious. They second-guess themselves. They notice weird small details the way actual people do when something feels wrong, focusing on the strange smell or the too-green lawn rather than making a quip. The humor comes from a different place: the absurdity of ordinary people confronting the impossible, trying to be polite about it because that's what you do.

I'm not sure why this works as well as it does, but I think it's related to how anxiety has replaced sarcasm as the dominant emotional register for a lot of contemporary readers. The snarky narrator feels like armor. The anxious narrator feels like a mirror.

Writing Urban Fantasy Settings That Earn Their City

Most urban fantasy set in, say, Chicago could be relocated to Cleveland without changing a single plot point. The city is backdrop, not character. A few streets get named. A landmark shows up. But the story doesn't actually need that city.

Patricia Briggs solved this by picking the Tri-Cities area of Washington state for her Mercy Thompson series, a place nobody else was using, a place most readers had never been. Because it wasn't a famous city, she had to actually build it on the page. You learn the geography through Mercy's daily life: the auto shop where she works, the Columbia River, the specific feel of a small desert city surrounded by agricultural land. The supernatural elements grow out of the landscape rather than being dropped onto it.

The lesson is counterintuitive. If you want your city to feel real, pick a place that doesn't come pre-loaded with associations. Or if you pick a famous city, go small. Write a neighborhood, not a skyline.

Every morning, writers get a short reflection on the work of writing. It reads like a page from a good book, and it takes two minutes.

Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe anytime.

How to Write Urban Fantasy That Lasts

Travis Baldree's Legends & Lattes is technically cozy fantasy, not urban fantasy, but it did something that matters for the genre: it proved that readers will follow a fantasy protagonist who isn't solving a mystery or saving the world. Viv, his orc barbarian, opens a coffee shop. That's the book. The stakes are small. The tension is real. Will the shop succeed? Will the neighborhood accept her?

Urban fantasy can learn from this because the genre has been trapped in an escalation cycle for years. Book one: solve a murder. Book five: prevent an apocalypse. Book nine: become a god. The stakes ratchet up until they lose all meaning, and readers stop caring because the world has been saved so many times that the threat feels hollow.

The writers who'll define the next decade of the genre are the ones who figure out that stakes don't have to mean scale. A werewolf trying to keep custody of her kids after a messy divorce. A necromancer dealing with gentrification in a neighborhood where the dead have opinions about zoning. These aren't lesser stories. They're harder to write because you can't lean on spectacle, and harder to put down because they're about things that actually keep people up at night.


I think about this a lot when I sit down to write in the morning. There's a version of every genre that's easy, that follows the proven template, that gives readers exactly what they expect. And there's a version that takes the parts that actually matter, the emotional core, the structural logic, the reason people keep coming back, and rebuilds the surface completely.

The second version is harder. It requires understanding your genre well enough to know which walls are load-bearing and which are just paint. But it's the version that tends to still be in print twenty years later.

If you're writing urban fantasy and want to think more clearly about the work, our free daily emails for urban fantasy writers are built for exactly this. One short reflection each morning before you open the draft.

That's what we send writers every morning. One reflection to sit with before you open the draft.

Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe anytime.

K

Kia Orion

Author of The Writer's Daily Practice, the #1 Bestselling book in Journal Writing and Writing Skills. He writes a free daily reflection for writers.

Keep reading

Stop staring at the blank page. Start writing with purpose.

A free daily reflection delivered to writers every morning. Quotes from literary masters, an original reflection, and a prompt to get you writing.

Join 1,000+ writers. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.