A craft-driven writing exercise with context explaining what the exercise trains and which authors used the technique
An original reflection connecting the exercise to a real writing principle you can use today
A quote from a literary master to ground your morning in craft, not hustle
What this genre teaches
The love story carries the weight of everything it took to get here.
Sapphic romance exists in a literary tradition where for decades, queer women in fiction didn't get happy endings. They died, they went mad, they returned to men. The HEA in sapphic romance carries a specific weight because of what came before. When Malinda Lo published Ash in 2009, a Cinderella retelling with a female love interest and a genuinely happy ending, it mattered beyond the plot. That context is part of what readers bring to your book, whether you write about it directly or not.
The characters' queerness can be the whole story or just part of the furniture.
Casey McQuiston's One Last Stop features a bisexual protagonist, and the story is about time travel and falling in love on a subway. Her queerness shapes her experience without defining every scene. Sarah Waters's Fingersmith is set in Victorian England, and the characters' queerness is central to every twist. Both approaches work. What matters is that you've chosen deliberately, not defaulted to one because you didn't consider the other.
The "bury your gays" trope still haunts the genre, and readers notice.
There's a long history of queer characters in fiction dying to serve the plot, and sapphic romance readers carry that history into every book they open. This doesn't mean your characters can't face real stakes or real loss. It means that if you're writing in this genre, you should know the trope exists and make conscious choices about how you handle threat, grief, and endings. Melissa Brayden writes sapphic romance with genuine conflict and guaranteed happy endings, and her readers trust her because of it.
Found family and community do real structural work in this genre.
In many sapphic romances, the community around the couple is doing something that biological family would do in a straight romance. The friend group, the queer community, the chosen network, these aren't decoration. They're load-bearing walls. Emily M. Danforth's The Miseducation of Cameron Post uses the people Cameron finds as a mirror for who she's becoming. The romance matters, but the world around it makes the romance possible.
Tenderness is a craft decision, and it hits differently in this genre.
Sapphic romance readers consistently respond to tenderness, the small physical gestures, the quiet admissions, the moments where vulnerability is met with care. I'm not entirely sure why this registers differently than it does in heterosexual romance, but I think it has something to do with the fact that tenderness between women has been underrepresented for so long that when it appears on the page, it reads as both personal and political at the same time. It's worth paying attention to those small moments in your drafts.
These observations are drawn from the craft decisions of published sapphic romance authors.
For a deeper look at writing in this space, start with how to write sapphic romance.
On writing sapphic romance
Sapphic Romance
How to Write Sapphic Romance That Feels True
What the best WLW romance writers get right, and what the rest get close. →
Sapphic Romance
Sapphic Romance Writing Techniques Worth Studying
Ideas from Waters, Brayden, and Parrish that changed how sapphic fiction works on the page. →
Sapphic Romance
Sapphic Romance Tropes That Actually Work
Observations about the tropes readers want, the ones that have aged out, and the ones that still surprise. →
A sample from your daily email
April 5th
"Conviction is the conscience of the mind."
- Nicolas Chamfort
Chamfort wrote this in the 1700s, and he had a complicated relationship with conviction. He supported the French Revolution and then watched it consume the people he cared about. His aphorisms were published after his death, and they read like someone who spent a lifetime learning the difference between borrowed confidence and the real thing.
For sapphic romance writers, there's a version of this that shows up almost every time you sit down to work. The external voices that tell you who your audience is, what your characters should look like, which tropes are selling, how much queerness the market can handle. Those voices have data behind them. Some of them are even right. But the story you're carrying around, the one with the love scene you're scared to write honestly and the ending that feels too tender and the character whose bisexuality shapes her choices in ways you haven't fully figured out yet, that story needs your conviction, not theirs.
Today's exercise: write one scene where a character follows her own instinct against the advice of someone she respects. Don't make it dramatic. Make it quiet. The moment of choosing what she knows over what she's been told.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Join The Writer's Daily Practice, a free daily exercise and reflection from literary masters, delivered to writers like you every morning.
Join 1,000+ writers. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
"I've tried every writing course and productivity system out there. This is the first thing that actually got me writing every day. Two months in, I finally started the novel I'd been thinking about for three years."
David M., first-time novelist
Sapphic romance is fiction centered on romantic relationships between women or woman-aligned characters. It includes lesbian romance, bisexual love stories, and any romance where the central couple is WLW (women loving women). The genre spans from contemporary settings (Casey McQuiston, Melissa Brayden) to historical (Sarah Waters) to fantasy (Malinda Lo). The term "sapphic" has become the preferred umbrella because it includes the full spectrum of queer women's experiences without reducing the genre to a single identity label.
Authenticity in sapphic romance comes from treating the characters as full people whose queerness is one dimension of who they are. The love story should work on the same craft principles as any romance: specific desire, real obstacles, earned resolution. Casey McQuiston writes bisexual characters whose orientation shapes their experience without defining their entire personality. Sarah Waters writes queer women in historical periods where their identity carries real danger. Both are authentic because the characters feel like people first.
No. Many of the most popular sapphic romances skip the coming-out arc entirely. Melissa Brayden's contemporary romances often feature characters who are already out, and the story focuses on the relationship itself. Malinda Lo's Ash reimagines Cinderella with a female love interest in a world where queerness doesn't require explanation. Some readers specifically seek stories where being queer is accepted, and others want the coming-out arc explored honestly. Both are valid directions, and your choice should serve the story you're telling.
Yes, with care. The sapphic romance community values authentic representation, and readers can tell when a writer has done their homework versus when they're writing from stereotypes. Sensitivity readers are standard practice. The bigger question is whether the specific story you want to tell requires lived experience you don't have. If you're writing a coming-out narrative set in a conservative community, that story might need a perspective you can't fully access. If you're writing a romantic comedy between two women who happen to be coworkers, the craft demands are more universal.