New Adult Techniques Worth Studying

Elle Kennedy Built a Friend Group That Outlasts Any Single Couple

The Off-Campus series does something structurally that's easy to miss if you're reading for the romance. Each book follows a different couple, but the friend group stays intact across all four novels. Garrett and Hannah from The Deal show up in The Mistake, not as protagonists but as people living their own ongoing lives in the background. Logan watches Dean's relationship unfold. Tucker inherits the house and its history. The couples rotate. The community persists.

Kennedy worked as a journalist before she started writing fiction, and I think that background trained her to notice how groups actually function. In college, you don't experience your friends' relationships in isolation. You watch them from across the kitchen table. You hear about the fight at 2 a.m. when your roommate comes home. You form opinions about someone's boyfriend before you've ever had a real conversation with him.

Most new adult writing techniques for series involve the same couple across multiple books, or a new cast in each installment. Kennedy found a third option: continuity lives in the group, not the couple. When you pick up The Score, you already know these people. You've watched Dean be reckless from someone else's point of view. Now you're inside his head, and the gap between who he seemed to be and who he actually is becomes the whole engine of the book. Same principle behind Friday Night Lights, which rotated storylines but kept Dillon, Texas constant. The town endured. Kennedy did the same thing with a house full of hockey players.

Jennifer L. Armentrout Writes Trauma Without Ever Using the Word Trauma

There's a trend in contemporary fiction where characters narrate their own psychological damage with the precision of a therapist's intake form. They name their attachment style. They identify their triggers. They explain, articulately, exactly why they're behaving the way they're behaving.

Armentrout's characters in the Wait for You series don't do this. Avery has been through something terrible, and you understand that from the first chapter. But she doesn't explain it to you. She flinches when someone touches her unexpectedly. She picks seats near exits. She has a whole choreography of self-protection built up over years, and she doesn't narrate it because she doesn't think of it as a system.

This is harder to write than it sounds. Armentrout resists the temptation to have a character think, I know I'm doing this because of what happened to me. Her characters have insight, but it arrives slowly, in fragments, often through someone else's observation. Cam notices things about Avery that Avery hasn't noticed about herself, and rather than telling her what they mean, he just adjusts. He sits on her left side without commenting. He doesn't grab her wrist when he reaches for her hand.

The new adult fiction tips here aren't really about trauma specifically. They're about the difference between a character who understands themselves and a character who's in the process of understanding themselves. People in their early twenties are almost always the second one.

Christina Lauren Proved That Two Unreliable Narrators Are Better Than One

The dual-POV romance is common enough now that it barely registers as a structural choice. But Christina Lauren (the writing duo of Christina Hobbs and Lauren Billings) does something with it that most dual-POV books don't attempt. Both narrators are wrong about each other, and the reader can see exactly how.

In The Unhoneymooners, Olive is convinced Ethan hates her. Ethan is convinced Olive finds him boring. The reader holds both misreadings simultaneously, and the tension comes from watching two people construct theories about each other that are almost entirely projection. Olive reads Ethan's quietness as judgment because that's what quietness meant in her family. Ethan reads Olive's loudness as dismissal because he's been dismissed by loud people before.

The Beautiful Bastard series, which started as Twilight fanfiction, pushed this further. The characters don't just misread each other's intentions. They misread their own. Chloe is certain she despises Bennett, Bennett is certain the tension between them is purely antagonistic, and they are both completely wrong, but the wrongness is specific to who they are and where they are in their lives, old enough to have built real defense mechanisms and young enough that those defenses are transparent to basically everyone except themselves.

I'm not entirely sure whether this technique works because of the dual POV itself or because of something Lauren figured out about the age range. At twenty-three, you've been hurt enough to have patterns but not enough to recognize them as patterns. Writing both sides of a misunderstanding lets the reader sit in that irony without either character having to become self-aware too soon.

The Best NA Fiction Treats the First Apartment Like a Character

There's an interview where the novelist Richard Ford talks about how the houses in his books are never just settings. They're arguments. The house a character chooses tells you what they believe about permanence.

New adult fiction does this with smaller spaces. The first apartment with a lease in your name. The dorm room you share with a stranger. The kitchen where you burn rice at midnight because nobody taught you to cook and you're figuring it out from a YouTube video with your phone propped against the salt shaker.

Kennedy's Off-Campus house is practically a character in itself. Armentrout's dorm rooms signal how safe or unsafe a character feels. When Avery finally lets Cam into her apartment, you understand what that means because you've spent chapters watching her control who enters her space and under what conditions.

The best new adult writing pays attention to this. A character's relationship to their physical space tells you everything about their internal state without a single line of introspection. A bed that's always made means something different from a bed that's never made, and both mean something different from a bed that gets made the morning a specific person is coming over.

I keep thinking about why these techniques stay with me when so many others fade. I think it's because they're all about the same thing. New adult characters live in a gap between who they were and who they'll become, and the writers who handle that gap best are the ones who've found structural ways to hold it open rather than close it too quickly. Kennedy holds it open through the group. Armentrout holds it open through the body. Lauren holds it open through the misunderstanding.

That gap is the whole genre, when you think about it. And learning to sit inside it, as a writer, without rushing toward resolution, is probably the hardest new adult writing technique of all.

Stop staring at the blank page. Start writing with purpose.

A free daily reflection delivered to writers every morning. Quotes from literary masters, an original reflection, and a prompt to get you writing.

Join 1,000+ writers. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.