Literary Fiction

Literary Fiction Techniques: Ideas That Changed How I Think About Prose

Kia Orion | | 10 min read

I didn't set out to study literary fiction techniques. I was reading, and certain books kept doing things to me that I couldn't explain. So I went back and tried to figure out what was happening at the sentence level, in the white space between paragraphs. Four writers changed how I think about prose. Here's what I took from them.


The best literary prose sounds like someone thinking out loud for the first time

George Saunders writes sentences that feel like they're discovering what they mean in the moment of being written. You can hear the mind working. In Tenth of December, a story will start with a voice so casual, so apparently unguarded, that you forget you're reading fiction. The narrator of "Victory Lap" shifts between three perspectives, and each one sounds like someone caught mid-thought, still sorting through what they actually believe.

Most of us, when we sit down to write literary fiction, reach for a tone that signals seriousness. Longer sentences. Heavier diction. We try to sound like we've already figured out what we're saying. Saunders does the opposite. His prose has the texture of someone working it out as they go, and that's exactly why you trust it.

His craft essays at Syracuse get at this directly. He talks about revising a sentence until it sounds like a human being speaking, until you can hear the breath in it. The enemy, for Saunders, is the polished sentence that sounds impressive but doesn't actually contain a thought. Literary fiction writing techniques get taught in workshops as a set of moves you can make. Saunders suggests that the best move might be to stop performing and start genuinely thinking on the page.

I'm still not sure I can do this consistently. Some mornings the writing comes out stiff and careful, and I can feel myself trying to sound like a writer instead of being one. The difference between those two things is everything.


Patience with a scene is more valuable than any technique you can learn

Marilynne Robinson's Gilead is a dying pastor's letter to his young son. The whole novel. And it moves at the speed of a man sitting in a chair, watching light come through a window, thinking about what his life has meant. Scenes that another writer would compress into a paragraph, Robinson lets breathe for five or six pages. A father watching his son play with a cat. An old memory of his own father, surfacing while he eats breakfast.

The instinct most writers have, especially writers trained on contemporary pacing, is to keep things moving. Get to the next scene. Advance the plot. Robinson refuses this completely. She sits with the moment until you feel it in your body. The literary fiction techniques at work in Gilead are almost invisible because the primary technique is patience, and patience doesn't look like technique at all.

Think about how a good physical therapist works compared to someone who just prescribes exercises. The therapist watches you move, waits, pays attention to what your body does when you're not performing. The exercises come later. The watching comes first. Robinson writes the way that therapist watches. She stays with a scene long enough for the thing underneath it to show itself. Most of us leave too early because we're afraid the reader will get bored, and in leaving early, we miss the part that would have made the scene matter.

This is the kind of thing we think about every morning. One idea about prose, one question about what your writing is doing, before you open the draft.

Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe anytime.

A narrator who barely exists can hold more than one who fills every page

Rachel Cusk's Outline trilogy did something I hadn't seen before. The narrator, a writer named Faye, barely tells you anything about herself. She sits on planes, in restaurants, in classrooms, and other people talk to her. They tell her about their marriages, their childhoods, their theories about life. And Faye mostly listens. You build your understanding of her almost entirely from the gaps, from what she chooses to record, from the questions she doesn't ask.

The best interviewers work this way. Studs Terkel, Terry Gross. They disappear so the subject can emerge. Terkel's oral histories feel like you're sitting across from the person yourself, because Terkel had the discipline to remove himself from the frame. Cusk did the same thing in fiction. She stripped away the backstory paragraphs, the interior monologue explaining what the narrator feels, and what remained was somehow more honest than any confessional first-person voice I've read.

I think this works because it respects the reader's intelligence. When a narrator explains everything they're feeling, you receive that information passively. When the narrator gives you almost nothing, you have to lean in and construct meaning yourself, and that act of construction is what makes the reading feel alive. It's a literary fiction technique that inverts the usual logic: less narrator, more presence.


Short sentences can carry as much weight as long ones if you let them land

Denis Johnson's Jesus' Son is eleven linked stories about addiction, drifting, and occasional grace, told in sentences that feel like they were written in a state of emergency. "All the really great operas have been written. So I began to write one." That's Johnson. Two sentences. The first one states a fact. The second one ignores it completely. And somehow the collision between those two sentences contains an entire worldview, a kind of delusional hope that I recognize in myself and in most writers I know.

Literary fiction has a reputation for density. Long paragraphs, subordinate clauses, sentences that take their time arriving at the verb. Johnson throws all of that out. His sentences are short and hallucinatory and they land like something dropped from a height. There's a moment in "Emergency" where the narrator and his friend see baby rabbits in the road, dozens of them, and the scene is described in maybe forty words and it's one of the most vivid things I've ever read. Johnson didn't need a long sentence to hold that image because the image was already doing all the work.

The lesson, if there is one, is that literary fiction writing techniques don't require length or complexity. A short sentence, placed with care, with silence around it, can carry the weight of an entire paragraph. Johnson died in 2017. His sentences are still landing.


Four writers, four ways of thinking about prose. Saunders taught me that good sentences sound like thinking. Robinson taught me to stay longer than I want to. Cusk taught me that absence can be a form of presence. Johnson taught me brevity and weight aren't opposites.

I don't use all these ideas every time I sit down to write. Some mornings I'm just trying to get words on the page. But they're in there somewhere, shaping the instincts, and on the good days I can feel them working underneath the sentences.

If you're working on literary fiction, having that daily anchor helps. One reflection, one honest question, before the blank page wins.

If you're working on literary fiction, having that daily anchor helps. One reflection, one honest question, before the blank page wins.

Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe anytime.

K

Kia Orion

Author of The Writer's Daily Practice, the #1 Bestselling book in Journal Writing and Writing Skills. He writes a free daily reflection for writers.

Keep reading

Stop staring at the blank page. Start writing with purpose.

A free daily reflection delivered to writers every morning. Quotes from literary masters, an original reflection, and a prompt to get you writing.

Join 1,000+ writers. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.