Epic Fantasy

Writing Epic Fantasy That Earns Its Scale

Kia Orion | | 7 min read

Robert Jordan announced The Wheel of Time in 1984 as a single novel. He had a draft. He had an ending in mind. He thought it would be one book, maybe two. By the time he died in 2007, he had written eleven volumes and the twelfth was unfinished. The world had grown beyond what any one life could contain.

Think about that math for a second. A writer sits down with a story he thinks he can tell in one volume. Twenty-three years later, the story has consumed fourteen books, thousands of pages, hundreds of named characters, and the ending still has to be handed to someone else. Brandon Sanderson finished it from Jordan's notes and outline, working from audio recordings Jordan made in his final months. It remains the most visible act of literary inheritance in modern fantasy.

There's something revealing in the gap between one book and fourteen. Jordan didn't set out to write something massive. The world kept generating questions he couldn't leave unanswered, and each answer opened new territory, and the readers followed because they could feel the territory was real. The series didn't bloat. It grew in the way a city grows, neighborhood by neighborhood, until it was too large for any single person to know completely.


Epic fantasy doesn't become epic because of length. It becomes epic because the world and the characters turn out to be genuinely inseparable, because you can't tell one story without accounting for the way it ripples across a dozen other lives and three different political systems and a magic no one fully understands yet. Scale is a symptom of commitment. The writers who write epic fantasy that earns its length are the ones who discovered the world was bigger than they thought. The ones who planned a five-book series from page one tend to produce something that feels like a building with too many empty rooms.

Epic Fantasy Expands When the World Starts Asking Questions the Characters Can't Answer

Jordan didn't plan fourteen books. The questions the world generated required fourteen books to answer. Every time a character crossed into a new kingdom, that kingdom had its own history, its own political tensions, its own relationship to the One Power. He could have sketched those details lightly and moved on. He didn't, because the story wouldn't let him. The Aiel Waste matters because the Aiel matter because the Dragon Reborn matters because the prophecy ties every culture together in ways none of them want to admit.

Sanderson's Stormlight Archive works the same way. The cosmere keeps expanding because each book raises questions the previous one can't fully answer. Why do the spren bond with some people and abandon others. What happened to the original Knights Radiant. Why does the Thrill exist and where does it come from. These aren't questions Sanderson sprinkles in for mystery. They're structural cracks in the world that the characters keep stumbling into.

The difference between epic fantasy that feels padded and epic fantasy that feels necessary is whether the scale comes from the story asking for it or from the author wanting a long series. You can tell the difference on every page. When a chapter exists because the world demanded it, you lean forward. When a chapter exists because the outline called for a second subplot in Act Two, you start checking how many pages are left.

This is the kind of thing we think about every morning. One reflection, one question, before you open the draft.

Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe anytime.

The Political Structure Has to Feel Like It Could Collapse

Tad Williams' Memory, Sorrow and Thorn is the book that made George R.R. Martin reconsider what fantasy could do with politics. Martin said so publicly. Williams' Osten Ard is terrifying because the political order is fragile in the specific way real institutions are fragile. The king is dying. The heirs are competing. The southern kingdoms have their own agendas and their own grievances and none of them care about the prophecy the main characters are trying to fulfill.

The threat in that series isn't just the Storm King. It's the human institutions that are already rotting from the inside before any supernatural force touches them. The court intrigue, the petty ambitions, the way people with power protect that power even when the world is ending around them. Williams understood that readers feel dread most acutely when the danger maps onto something they recognize from their own world, from watching real governments fail to respond to real crises because the people in charge were busy protecting their positions.

Epic fantasy without realistic institutional fragility reads like a board game. You move the good pieces and the bad pieces and someone wins. The kind that lasts, the kind that people argue about for decades, makes you feel like the institutions could fail at any moment for reasons that have nothing to do with the villain.

The Supporting Characters Have to Want Something the Plot Can't Give Them

Robin Hobb's contribution to epic fantasy lives in characters most writers would treat as background. Patience. Kettricken. Molly. These aren't functional pieces slotted into roles. Each of them wants something specific and personal that Fitz's story can't provide, and Hobb lets you see those wants clearly enough that the reader starts caring about outcomes the plot has no intention of delivering.

Patience wants to be taken seriously as an intellect in a court that dismissed her decades ago. Kettricken wants to serve her kingdom in the way she was raised to serve, but Buckkeep operates on entirely different assumptions about duty and sacrifice. These desires don't exist to support the main plot. They exist because Hobb treats every character as someone living their own story that happens to intersect with the one you're reading.

I don't know what to make of the fact that the characters people argue about most in fantasy forums are rarely the protagonists. But it's consistent enough to be worth paying attention to. When readers argue about Kettricken's choices, or debate whether Patience was right, they're engaging with the book at the level where it actually lives. The protagonist gives you the plot. The supporting characters give you the world.


I keep thinking about that gap between one book and fourteen when I sit down to write in the morning. The best writing sessions are the ones where the work reveals itself as bigger than you expected. You thought you were writing a scene and you realize you're writing toward a question you didn't know you had. That's the feeling worth chasing, whether you're writing epic fantasy or a paragraph in your notebook.

That's what we send writers every morning. One reflection to sit with before you open the draft.

Get tomorrow's reflection free.

That's what we send writers every morning. One reflection to sit with before you open the draft.

Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe anytime.

K

Kia Orion

Author of The Writer's Daily Practice, the #1 Bestselling book in Journal Writing and Writing Skills. He writes a free daily reflection for writers.

Keep reading

Stop staring at the blank page. Start writing with purpose.

A free daily reflection delivered to writers every morning. Quotes from literary masters, an original reflection, and a prompt to get you writing.

Join 1,000+ writers. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.