A craft-driven writing exercise with context explaining what the exercise trains and which authors used the technique
An original reflection connecting the exercise to a real writing principle you can use today
A quote from a literary master to ground your morning in craft, not hustle
Writing fiction that refuses to look away
Moral complexity has to serve the story, not the author's desire to be edgy.
Abercrombie's The First Law trilogy is full of terrible people doing terrible things. But each terrible act reveals something about who that person is and what they've lost. Glokta tortures people because he was tortured, and now cruelty is the only currency that still works for him. The darkness isn't decoration. It's characterization. When new dark fantasy writers pile on brutality without connecting it to someone's interior life, readers feel the difference immediately, even if they can't name what's missing.
Violence works when it has weight, not frequency.
Glen Cook's The Black Company follows mercenaries through a war, and there's plenty of bloodshed. But what sticks isn't the battles. It's the way Croaker writes about them afterward, dry and clinical, like a man who stopped being shocked by what he's seen years ago. The violence registers because Cook gives you someone who has to carry the memory of it. Lawrence does something similar in Prince of Thorns: Jorg is fourteen and already broken, and the violence reads differently when it comes from someone that young. One death that changes the narrator is worth more than fifty that don't.
The antihero needs a code, even if the code is wrong.
Readers will follow a protagonist who does awful things if they can trace the logic. Abercrombie's Logen Ninefingers has a reputation as the most dangerous man in the North, and he genuinely wants to stop killing people. He can't. But the wanting is what makes him readable. Lawrence's Jorg has a different code: he'll do whatever it takes to claim the throne, and he's honest about that, brutally so. The reader doesn't have to agree with the code. They have to understand it well enough to predict what the character will do next, and then watch what happens when the code meets a situation it can't handle.
The world should feel indifferent, not hostile.
The weakest dark fantasy worlds feel like they were designed to punish the characters. Every institution is corrupt, every person is a liar, every glimmer of hope gets crushed on schedule. That's not darkness. That's a rigged game, and readers can feel the author's hand on the scale. The best dark fantasy worlds, like Spark's Empires of Dust, feel genuinely indifferent. The world doesn't care whether the characters suffer or thrive. It just keeps going. That indifference is harder to write than cruelty, and it's more disturbing to read.
Hope in dark fantasy is a rare mineral, not a renewable resource.
Cook understood this. In The Black Company, there are moments of genuine warmth between the soldiers, jokes told in camp, loyalty that holds even when everything else falls apart. Those moments land harder because of the darkness around them. If every chapter is bleak, bleakness becomes the new baseline and stops meaning anything. Abercrombie does this too: the friendship between Logen and Bayaz starts with something that looks like real respect, and when it sours, it hurts because the reader had started to trust it. The hope doesn't have to win. It just has to exist long enough for the reader to care when it's gone.
These patterns show up in the dark fantasy that stays with readers long after the last page.
For a closer look, start with how to write dark fantasy.
On dark fantasy
Craft
How to Write Dark Fantasy
Abercrombie, Winter, and Hayes on moral weight and earned brutality. →
Ideas
Dark Fantasy Techniques: Ideas That Changed How I Write the Bleak Stuff
Lawrence, Cook, and Bakker on cynicism, war, and philosophical horror. →
Observations
Things I've Noticed About Dark Fantasy
Spark, Winter, Eames, and Cook on what this genre gets right and wrong. →
A sample from your daily email
September 2nd
"It's not the writing part that's hard. What's hard is sitting down to write."
- Steven Pressfield
Pressfield spent twenty-seven years as a struggling writer before he published his first novel. He drove trucks, picked fruit, worked on oil rigs, and lived in his car for stretches at a time. He kept writing through all of it, and he kept failing. When The Legend of Bagger Vance finally sold, he was in his fifties. Interviewers always ask him about discipline and routine. He tends to answer with something closer to stubbornness.
The thing nobody tells you about writer's block is that it rarely looks like staring at a blank screen. It looks like checking your email one more time. It looks like reorganizing your desk, or doing laundry, or telling yourself that the idea needs more time to marinate before you're ready to write it. The procrastination wears the costume of productivity, and it's convincing enough to fool you for weeks at a time if you let it.
Pressfield calls it Resistance, with a capital R. He treats it like an enemy combatant. I think the metaphor holds, but what makes it useful is simpler than that: the hardest part of any writing day is the three minutes before you start. Once you're in the chair with the file open, something usually happens. The words might be bad. They might be worse than bad. But the writing that exists is always more useful than the writing you were going to do after you felt ready.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Join The Writer's Daily Practice, a free daily exercise and reflection from literary masters, delivered to writers like you every morning.
Join 1,000+ writers. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
"I've tried every writing course and productivity system out there. This is the first thing that actually got me writing every day. Two months in, I finally started the novel I'd been thinking about for three years."
David M., first-time novelist
Fantasy fiction that foregrounds moral ambiguity, graphic violence, and worlds where traditional heroism fails or costs too much. Dark fantasy occupies the space between epic fantasy and horror, keeping the secondary-world setting while stripping away the comfort of clear good-vs-evil framing. Joe Abercrombie's The First Law trilogy, Glen Cook's The Black Company, and Mark Lawrence's The Broken Empire are foundational examples.
Give them a code they actually follow, then put them in situations where the code fails. Abercrombie's Logen Ninefingers believes he wants to be a better man, but violence is the only skill he has, and the story keeps asking him to use it. A morally gray character needs internal logic, not inconsistency. The reader should understand why they do terrible things, even while wishing they wouldn't.
Grimdark is a subcategory of dark fantasy that pushes the cynicism further. In dark fantasy, there may be hope. In grimdark, the hope is usually the last thing to die, and it dies badly. Grimdark also tends toward political nihilism and institutional failure. Abercrombie and Lawrence are typically called grimdark. Cook's Black Company sits at the border. The line is blurry and most readers don't care about the taxonomy as long as the story earns its darkness.
When the darkness serves the author instead of the story. Graphic content works when it reveals character or advances conflict. It fails when it exists to prove the writer is edgy. Anna Smith Spark writes some of the bleakest fantasy in print, and it works because the brutality connects to what her characters want and fear. The question isn't how dark you can go. It's whether each dark moment changes something for someone on the page.