Afrofuturism

Afrofuturism Techniques Worth Studying

Kia Orion | | 5 min read

There's a handful of afrofuturism techniques that, once you see them, change how you read everything else. Here are the five I keep coming back to.

N.K. Jemisin Wrote a World Where the Earth Itself Is the Antagonist

The Broken Earth trilogy takes place on a supercontinent called the Stillness, which is a name that should tip you off right away because nothing about it is still. The planet shakes. It ruptures. It buries civilizations in ash every few centuries like clockwork. And Jemisin doesn't write this as setting. She writes it as intent. The earth in these books isn't indifferent. It's hostile. It remembers what was done to it and it retaliates across geologic time.

This is worldbuilding as adversarial design. The ground beneath the characters' feet is working against them, and every cultural adaptation in the book, the stone lore, the comm structures, the way people hoard resources, exists because generations of people had to negotiate with a planet that wants them gone.

There's a useful comparison outside of writing. Architects who design buildings in seismic zones don't fight the geology. They build flexible foundations, work with the movement. Jemisin does the opposite on purpose. Her characters are locked in a confrontation with the planet itself, and that generates story on every single page because the antagonist is literally everywhere.

Nnedi Okofor Treats Technology and Spirituality as the Same Sentence

In Binti, the title character carries otjize, a mixture of red clay and oils that's traditional to her Himba people. She rubs it on her skin. It's cultural. It's identity. It's how she carries home with her when she leaves for the first time. And then, about a third of the way into the story, the otjize turns out to also be a technology. It interacts with alien biology. It does things no one expected, least of all Binti.

Western science fiction has a habit of separating these categories cleanly. Technology is the rational stuff. Culture and spirituality are the soft stuff, the things characters believe before they learn better. Okofor doesn't accept that division. In her work, a traditional practice handed down through generations can also be the most advanced piece of technology in the room and there's no contradiction, no moment where one reading replaces the other. They coexist because the separation was always artificial.

I think this is one of the most quietly radical moves in contemporary speculative fiction. It doesn't argue against the Western framework. It just refuses to use it. And that refusal opens up story possibilities that are closed off to writers who start from the assumption that science and tradition sit on opposite sides of a line.

Rivers Solomon Writes Bodies That Carry History They Haven't Lived

In An Unkindness of Ghosts, the characters live on a generation ship that's stratified by deck, by skin color, by proximity to the artificial sun at the ship's top. The lowest decks are the darkest, the coldest, the most brutal. And the people who live there carry that history in their bodies, in chronic pain, in behavioral patterns they can't fully explain, in the way their nervous systems respond to authority.

The Deep takes this further. It imagines the descendants of pregnant African women thrown overboard during the Middle Passage, who evolved to live underwater. They carry inherited memory of a trauma they didn't experience firsthand but that shaped them all the way down to their biology.

Memoir and literary fiction try to do this too, to make the past present tense, to show how history lives in a body long after the events themselves have ended. But Solomon has tools those genres don't. Speculative fiction lets you literalize the metaphor. You can write a character who physically carries ancestral memory because the world's rules allow it. You're not reaching for a symbol. You're building a mechanism. And somehow, making it concrete makes it hit harder than the metaphor alone ever could.

These are the kinds of observations that change what you notice when you're reading, and what you reach for when you're writing.

Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe anytime.

Second-Person and Non-Linear Time Are Genre Tools

When Jemisin opens The Fifth Season in second person, it reads like a dare. "You" are a woman whose husband has just killed your son and taken your daughter. The present tense. The direct address. It feels confrontational for maybe two pages before you realize what she's actually doing.

The protagonist, Essun, has dissociated from her own life. The second person isn't a stylistic flourish. It's the sound of a woman who can't say "I" about the worst thing that ever happened to her. The form mirrors the psychology, and once you understand that, the technique stops feeling experimental and starts feeling necessary. She couldn't have told this particular story any other way.

Afrofuturism writers reach for non-standard narrative structures more often than most genre writers, and I don't think it's an aesthetic preference. I think the stories they're telling require it. When you're writing about cyclical time, or inherited memory, or a character who exists in multiple timelines simultaneously, conventional chronological narration breaks down. It can't hold the shape of the experience. So you find a form that can, or you build one.

The Genre's Best Trick Is Making the Reader Build the World Themselves

Okofor drops you into Binti's world mid-stride. Solomon opens An Unkindness of Ghosts on the lower decks of a generation ship without explaining what a generation ship is, or why these people are on it, or what the social hierarchy means. You piece it together from context. From how characters talk to each other. From what they take for granted and what scares them.

This is one of the hardest afrofuturism writing tips to actually internalize. The confidence to withhold explanation. Because the instinct, especially when you're writing from a cultural context that your assumed reader might not share, is to over-explain. To footnote. To pause the story and make sure everyone's caught up. And the result of that over-explanation is always the same: the world stops feeling lived-in. It starts feeling like a museum exhibit with little cards next to everything.

Afrofuturist writers tend to be better at resisting that instinct than most, and I'm not entirely sure why. Maybe it's because the alternative, explaining every cultural detail for an outsider's comfort, would flatten exactly the specificity that makes the work matter. Maybe it's just that these are writers who trust their readers more than most. Either way, the result is fiction that feels like a place you've walked into rather than a place someone is describing to you from a distance, and that quality, that sense of arrival, is something worth studying regardless of what genre you write in.


These are all afrofuturism techniques you can study on the page, but studying them means reading with a different kind of attention. Noticing the decisions, not just the effects. Asking why this sentence is in second person instead of first, why that technology is also a prayer, why the writer trusts you enough to leave a gap where an explanation could go.

That kind of reading is a practice. We send writers one reflection every morning to help build it.

The techniques worth studying are the ones you can feel working on you as a reader. That awareness starts before you open the draft.

Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe anytime.

K

Kia Orion

Author of The Writer's Daily Practice, the #1 Bestselling book in Journal Writing and Writing Skills. He writes a free daily reflection for writers.

Keep reading

Stop staring at the blank page. Start writing with purpose.

A free daily reflection delivered to writers every morning. Quotes from literary masters, an original reflection, and a prompt to get you writing.

Join 1,000+ writers. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.